Comments on: Paint-over revision http://www.sintel.org/concept-art/paint-over-revision/ Sintel, the Durian Open Movie Project Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:26:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3 By: Clayton Hemminger http://www.sintel.org/concept-art/paint-over-revision/comment-page-2/#comment-92528 Clayton Hemminger Sun, 24 Apr 2011 10:31:16 +0000 http://durian.blender.org/?p=1264#comment-92528 Can you tell the reader to subscribe this blog via different means instead of via RSS? I never load it on my readers while I can see it using chrome. Can you tell the reader to subscribe this blog via different means instead of via RSS? I never load it on my readers while I can see it using chrome.

]]> By: Ellis Dahill http://www.sintel.org/concept-art/paint-over-revision/comment-page-2/#comment-83280 Ellis Dahill Sun, 03 Apr 2011 20:13:23 +0000 http://durian.blender.org/?p=1264#comment-83280 you could have an important weblog right here! would you wish to make some invite posts on my blog? you could have an important weblog right here! would you wish to make some invite posts on my blog?

]]> By: JamikKim http://www.sintel.org/concept-art/paint-over-revision/comment-page-2/#comment-24194 JamikKim Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:49:07 +0000 http://durian.blender.org/?p=1264#comment-24194 Yukkeee, I think I need to go and revisit my Sintel pictures collection to remove that! It's sort-a funny but...I think I like waht she looks like too much for that... ;) Yukkeee, I think I need to go and revisit my Sintel pictures collection to remove that!

It’s sort-a funny but…I think I like waht she looks like too much for that… ;)

]]> By: Ir. B.L. Obrachne http://www.sintel.org/concept-art/paint-over-revision/comment-page-2/#comment-21732 Ir. B.L. Obrachne Sat, 02 Oct 2010 01:40:39 +0000 http://durian.blender.org/?p=1264#comment-21732 Nice 1!, I so relished this. It definitely will inspire me to try to find out more about it myself. Keep up the nice work. Nice 1!, I so relished this. It definitely will inspire me to try to find out more about it myself. Keep up the nice work.

]]> By: พระเครื่อง http://www.sintel.org/concept-art/paint-over-revision/comment-page-2/#comment-18417 พระเครื่อง Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:37:02 +0000 http://durian.blender.org/?p=1264#comment-18417 I similar to this data given and this has presented me some sort of desire to have success for some factor, so thank you. I similar to this data given and this has presented me some sort of desire to have success for some factor, so thank you.

]]> By: Peter http://www.sintel.org/concept-art/paint-over-revision/comment-page-2/#comment-11362 Peter Tue, 18 May 2010 22:26:27 +0000 http://durian.blender.org/?p=1264#comment-11362 Hmm... I think I'm missing something here... When I saw this picture I smirked and went, "Heh..." Other than that, though, I haven't really found this funny... Maybe I'm just not very emotional... Hmm… I think I’m missing something here… When I saw this picture I smirked and went, “Heh…” Other than that, though, I haven’t really found this funny… Maybe I’m just not very emotional…

]]> By: Francisco Ortiz http://www.sintel.org/concept-art/paint-over-revision/comment-page-2/#comment-3820 Francisco Ortiz Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:01:18 +0000 http://durian.blender.org/?p=1264#comment-3820 last link Sintel and Emo: http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/-F7DB17boCLxN1GR2-Jf4Q?feat=directlink last link Sintel and Emo:

http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/-F7DB17boCLxN1GR2-Jf4Q?feat=directlink

]]> By: Francisco Ortiz http://www.sintel.org/concept-art/paint-over-revision/comment-page-2/#comment-3818 Francisco Ortiz Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:59:50 +0000 http://durian.blender.org/?p=1264#comment-3818 @eye208: "Yes, I’ve read the statements." Well i think you didn't do it carefully. Please read it again. "And yes, I think the neck in mokoko’s picture is a big improvement. Anything that makes the character look more life-like is an improvement, even if it’s just a small change. I don’t see any added complexity. The topology is the same." It's incorrect to analyze topology without looking to the wires. That's what you're doing here. To achieve something like Mokoko's modification the Durian Team will need to retopo work the neck's area because proportions are different. That's not "small change" anything. Please check my comments inside this picture to see the added complexity and "the neck paradox, by Mokoko": http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/Rf2RSvbKVfANTI7Zc_iUbg?feat=directlink To see the same picture as above but without comments please click here: http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/nCkP4JdBAK_eFA_msTqCwQ?feat=directlink "The broomstick necks were cool in Elephants Dream. Don’t repeat it. Don’t steal ideas." This is misconception from you. Please compare wires >>> (http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/-F7DB17boCLxN1GR2-Jf4Q?feat=directlink) before stating this kind of thing again. Yours, Ortiz @eye208:

“Yes, I’ve read the statements.”

Well i think you didn’t do it carefully. Please read it again.

“And yes, I think the neck in mokoko’s picture is a big improvement. Anything that makes the character look more life-like is an improvement, even if it’s just a small change. I don’t see any added complexity. The topology is the same.”

It’s incorrect to analyze topology without looking to the wires. That’s what you’re doing here.

To achieve something like Mokoko’s modification the Durian Team will need to retopo work the neck’s area because proportions are different. That’s not “small change” anything.

Please check my comments inside this picture to see the added complexity and “the neck paradox, by Mokoko”:

http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/Rf2RSvbKVfANTI7Zc_iUbg?feat=directlink

To see the same picture as above but without comments please click here:

http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/nCkP4JdBAK_eFA_msTqCwQ?feat=directlink

“The broomstick necks were cool in Elephants Dream. Don’t repeat it. Don’t steal ideas.”

This is misconception from you. Please compare wires >>> (http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/-F7DB17boCLxN1GR2-Jf4Q?feat=directlink) before stating this kind of thing again.

Yours,

Ortiz

]]> By: Greg M. Johnson http://www.sintel.org/concept-art/paint-over-revision/comment-page-2/#comment-3781 Greg M. Johnson Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:57:47 +0000 http://durian.blender.org/?p=1264#comment-3781 Lame. "Smoking is so debonair!" Lame. “Smoking is so debonair!”

]]> By: Arne Babenhauserheide http://www.sintel.org/concept-art/paint-over-revision/comment-page-2/#comment-3650 Arne Babenhauserheide Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:57:51 +0000 http://durian.blender.org/?p=1264#comment-3650 > eyepatch Arrr ye lad :) A nice way to answer ;) > eyepatch

Arrr ye lad :)

A nice way to answer ;)

]]>